Long-time readers with good memories will remember that I've discussed this before. Well, I'm discussing it again--but from a more realistic angle, unfortunately. Too many people have died in the interim.
There's an old tale told about a feuding couple that comes to see a rabbi. (This was in the days before mental-health professionals.) First, the husband tells his side of the story, and the rabbi says, "You're right." Then, the wife tells her side of the story, and the rabbi says, "You're right." The rebbitzen (rabbi's wife), who's been eavesdropping, calls her husband aside. "They can't
both be right," she says. The rabbi replies, "You're right, too."
That's the way I feel about the West Bank.
On the one hand,
here's what New York Jewish Week editor/publisher Gary Rosenblatt has to say about the West Bank: "We were among the last to recognize that the growing population of Jews in the West Bank and Gaza was making the separation of Jews and Arabs more difficult and hastening the day when an Arab majority in the State of Israel could end Jewish sovereignty, not on the battlefield but through the ballot box."
On the other hand, see these photos of Tel Aviv taken from Peduel. (Keep scrolling--the pictures are nearly at the botton of the page.) As Elder of Ziyon says, "Tel Aviv is a whopping 10 miles away from Peduel - easily within rocket range."
Once upon a time, before the Summer 2006 War, I was naive enough to believe that the size of the State of Israel didn't matter. After all, if Israel's enemies could target Tel Aviv all the way from Teheran, what difference did it make how much land was contained within Israel's borders?
S'derot put the lie to that. You don't need a nuke to wreak havoc. All you need is a homemade rocket launcher close enough to the nearest Israeli town to kill a few kindergarteners in cold blood.
Once upon a time, before the Summer 2006 War, I was naive enough to believe that the hitnatkut, the withdrawal from Gush Katif and the Northern Shomron/Samaria, was tragic, but necessary for peace.
I might have been at least partially right, had the Israeli government upheld its commitment to target the Gaza terrorists once the settlers were out of harm's way. But alas, 'twas not to be. So I was wrong on both counts: Not only is the Israeli government failing to take adequate measures to protect its own citizens, but, to boot, the withdrawal do not improve Israel's prospects of achieving peace with the Palestinians.
Israel withdrew first from the "safety zone" in southern Lebanon, then from Aza/Gaza, and the only thing it got in return was the dubious privilege of being shelled from those same locations. The only thing that territorial concessions seem to bring is a demand for more territorial concessions. Israel's enemies see compromise for the sake of peace as a sign of weakness, and target Israel accordingly. (See Daniel Gordis's January 2, 2008 article, "Back to the Mishnah.")
Still, what about the demographic problem? Is it possible to keep Israel Jewish with so many Arabs within its borders?
I'm e-mailing a link to this post to West Bank Mama as soon as I publish it--I think that, as a resident of Peduel, she should be among the first to see it.
Update, from West Bank Mama:
Shira - please tell your readers who click on the Elder of Zion link, that although the picture was taken with a telephoto lens, the entire coastline, from Hadera down to south of Tel-Aviv is visible from Peduel with the naked eye.Anyone living on the coast should be grateful that I live in this yishuv - and not a terrorist with a rocket launcher.
westbankmama